Otra tarea cumplida de una ilustración de la WT donde descubrimos s algo...

2022.01.25 02:32 Psychological_Eye167 Otra tarea cumplida de una ilustración de la WT donde descubrimos s algo...

Otra tarea cumplida de una ilustración de la WT donde descubrimos s algo... submitted by Psychological_Eye167 to Extj [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 FADIKALIL أمیر عبداللهیان : إذا کان التوصل إلى اتفاق جید یتطلب حوارا مع امریکا فلن نتجاهله- الأخبار ایران

submitted by FADIKALIL to Beiruttime [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 superfahd A bunch of questions from an absolute beginner. Any help appreciated

Hi all. I'm trying to approach this game without looking up any videos for help but there are some things I can't seem to figure out. I've just started the campaign and only gotten to the first fleet HQ location for saving

  1. Is there a way to scout out cities to see what sort of opposition you'll be facing before committing to a fight? In my last battle I sent out a quick fast detachment of 2 ships and nearly got wiped out because I sent them in blind. I won at the end but it was pretty hairy
  2. At the beginning of the campaign, you're advised to take at least 1 tanker but there are no tanker in the roster. I see that the Sevastopol has tanker capabilities. Is that enough at the beginning?
  3. If individual ships have their own ranges, how exactly do tankers help? Does having a tanker increase your overall range? Do ships refuel inflight automatically?
  4. At the beginning I was told to search for allies "in the north-west". That's pretty vague. There are a lot of places that are roughly NW. How far am I supposed to search?
  5. I read somewhere in this subreddit that proximity munitions are completely broken because of how much damage they do. Should I avoid using them for now? I don't want to cheese the campaign
  6. Is there any way to force a save before getting to a fleet HQ? I usually dont a lot of time to game and would hate to lose my progress
submitted by superfahd to Highfleet [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 ShakaUVM The Free World Defense to the Problem of Evil

We are all aware that Free Will is considered a generally robust defense against the Problem of Evil when it comes to moral evil; in this post I will show that the Free World defense is sufficient to cover what is called "natural evil" as well.
Let me start with some obvious points that a lot of people seem to miss when it comes to the Problem of evil.
P1) Tyranny is a moral evil, and
P2) Freedom is a moral good.
Justification: Freedom is, in fact, the most basic of all moral goods, as if you remove someone's freedom, you have removed their ability to make moral decisions. Consider, for example, a robber who holds up a bank. Normally, tellers will not rob from a bank and give you money, but when the robber tyrannically imposes on them with a gun, they remove the freedom of the teller, and compel them to do evil (theft) on the robber's behalf.
Tyranny (enforcing one's will over another's will) removes freedom. Therefore, it is inherently evil.
God desires people to make moral decisions, and thus does not desire to be a tyrant. We know this since the most basic purpose of the Bible is moral instruction - moral instruction is incompatible with tyranny, as tyranny overrides moral agency, and moral instruction cultivates moral agency.
Or to put it an even simpler way, since tyranny is fundamentally evil, it is incompatible with omnibenevolence.
Therefore, all versions of the Problem of Evil that require God to be an omnibenevolent tyrant are self-contradictory, and thus logically invalid.
Now let's see how many PoEs we can take out in one fell swoop...
Which versions of the Problem of Evil demand a tyrant? Well, close to all of them. Remember, tyranny is defined as doing something just because you desire it, enforcing your will over other's will. So many versions of the Problem of Evil do what I call the Tyrant Twist, where they leap immediately from God desiring something to thinking that God must do them - i.e., presuming that God must be a tyrant. But they rarely spell it out explicitly, because to do so would give up the game, and make it obvious that the argument doesn't actually work.
Here's the first formulation from the SEP: 1. If God exists, then God is omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfect. 2. If God is omnipotent, then God has the power to eliminate all evil. 3. If God is omniscient, then God knows when evil exists. 4. If God is morally perfect, then God has the desire to eliminate all evil. 5. Evil exists. 6. If evil exists and God exists, then either God doesn’t have the power to eliminate all evil, or doesn’t know when evil exists, or doesn’t have the desire to eliminate all evil. 7. Therefore, God doesn’t exist.
The problem, is, of course, with 6. God has the power to eliminate all evil. God does know when evil exists. And God does desire to eliminate evil. So it's just clearly a blunder on the author's part. There's no logical connection between the antecedent and consequent, logically speaking, and no justification is provided. The author relies on the Tyrant Twist to provide some invisible handwaving. Of course God must enforce his desires, why wouldn't He?
Nonsense. Because God is not a tyrant.
Even a great philosopher like Rowe relies on the Tyrant Twist, but at least he does so explicitly: "P2. An omniscient, wholly good being would prevent the occurrence of any intense suffering it could, unless it could not do so without thereby losing some greater good or permitting some evil equally bad or worse."
Again, it relies on equating God's desires to always turning them into actions. I.e., acting as a tyrant, like Cartman in South Park.
For fun, here's Ricky Gervais' fallacious take on the PoE: https://inktank.fi/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/RickyGervaisatheistquote6.jpg
This is just a false alternatives fallacy. After all, having the ability to stop evil and the desire to stop evil, but choosing not to is not one of the options. Once again we see "Wanting to stop evil" presuming, invisibly, that God must take action on those desires.
Here's another from the SEP:

There are events in our world — such as an animal’s dying an agonizing death in a forest fire, and a child’s undergo lingering suffering and eventual death due to cancer — such that the actions of allowing those events, when one could prevent them, both (a) have very serious, known wrongmaking characteristics, and (b) have no rightmaking characteristics of which we are aware that are sufficient to balance out the known wrongmaking properties.
This is just an appeal to ignorance fallacy, so is invalid anyway (it is not allowed to conclude something from ignorance), but we see it ignoring the very real fact that freedom is a moral good.
(Freedom, honestly, seems to be completely neglected in these arguments, even by the SEP author.)
Here's Wikipedia's logical PoE formulation #1: 1. If an omnipotent, omnibenevolent and omniscient god exists, then evil does not. 2. There is evil in the world. 3. Therefore, an omnipotent, omnibenevolent and omniscient god does not exist.
Once again, we see in #1 the invisible assumption that desire must necessarily translate into action. The presumption that an all-good entity, which does not desire evil, must somehow stamp out all evil in the universe, thus becoming a tyrant. Thus this argument is invalid.
The second formulation on Wikipedia actually makes the Tyrant Twist clear: 1. God exists. 2. God is omnipotent, omnibenevolent and omniscient. 3. An omnipotent being has the power to prevent that evil from coming into existence. 4. An omnibenevolent being would want to prevent all evils. 5. An omniscient being knows every way in which evils can come into existence, and knows every way in which those evils could be prevented. 6. A being who knows every way in which an evil can come into existence, who is able to prevent that evil from coming into existence, and who wants to do so, would prevent the existence of that evil. 7. If there exists an omnipotent, omnibenevolent and omniscient God, then no evil exists. 8. Evil exists (logical contradiction).
  1. is of course the Tyrant Twist. That everything God desires He must necessarily turn into action. Thus enforcing His will over the wills of others. Thus removing moral agency, and any ability for morality in the universe to take place. Thus being evil. Thus making this argument also a contradiction, and thus invalid, and thus must be discarded like all of the others.
I could go on, but basically I'll just stop here and say how odd I find it that philosophers, who should know better, give such weight to tyranny and treat freedom so lightly, when our moral priorities should be the other way around. Freedom is a very serious moral matter. As I said before, it is the very foundation of morality, as morality cannot take place without freedom.
So let me say why God is not evil, and why God and evil in the world can and should co-exist. God desires man to have freedom, and not just freedom in the sense of free will, but freedom in the sense of a free world. This is proper moral behavior for an all-good entity, not the sky-tyrant that atheists presume when they ask - no, demand - that God intervene to stop all evils (or stop all gratuitous evils). They don't see the contradiction. I do. God grants us freedom in this world so that we can be moral agents. Moreover, so that we can grow in morality, and rise above a moral childhood and become moral adults. What distinguishes childhood and adulthood (other than age) is responsibility. We are responsible for this world.
In the very first chapter of the Bible, we see God granting dominion over the earth to mankind (Genesis 1:26). This means it is our earth to use or abuse. It is our responsibility. In the same way that we don't install spy cameras in every room in America (1984-style) knowing that some crime will result from this freedom, God has turned responsibility of the earth over to us. When there's a tsunami or pandemic, or a hundred other horrible events that we mistakenly call "natural evil" in philosophy, the obvious, emotional response is to ask God why. But that's a mistake. A moral blunder, though a very human one.
It's not God's responsibility to make a vaccine against Covid-19 or build breakwaters to stop a tsunami. It is ours. We are moral agents with dominion over the earth. It is our responsibility. It is a Free World, not a world under a tyrant. And this is morally good.
submitted by ShakaUVM to DebateReligion [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 R3ndr0c Has anyone recently climbed out of archon?

If so, how long did it take you, and what was your strategy?
submitted by R3ndr0c to DotA2 [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 FrontpageWatch2020 [#578|+2016|32] Put ur hands up if ur guilty of this😂 [r/memes]

submitted by FrontpageWatch2020 to longtail [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 delamerica93 Literally what the fuck do we do against Squirtle?

Squirtle can do literally anything he wants to link. Want to pull a bomb? Squirtle can run all the way across the stage before your animation is even over and do whatever they want. Almost none of our moves even hit because his hitbox is so short. Back air doesn't land, up tilt doesn't land, boomerangs are almost impossible to get off if the Squirtle is even halfway decent, and when they need to kill they get you offstage once, switch to Ivysaur, and spam their spike onstage with zero repercussions, lag, timing, nothing just spam and it works 90% of the time.
If you're a Pokemon trainer and you don't go Squirtle every single time you're an idiot, it's like playing on the easiest possible settings
submitted by delamerica93 to LinkMains [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 petyr2 Question about the blue trash bags

Can regular trash bags go inside them? (Like a small bathroom trash bag filled with trash)
Or does all the trash have to be visible through the bag?
submitted by petyr2 to Binghamton [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 ThatAbandonGuy Can I switch servers while keeping data?

Curious as to how (if able to) to switch servers.
submitted by ThatAbandonGuy to MerchantMaster [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 knitslip “华夷之辨”的真相

“华夷之辨”的真相 华夷之辨是华夏民族构建的文明体系,是华夏民族主流核心价值观。瞿太素说:
“其人而忠信焉,明哲焉,虽远在殊方,诸夏也。若夫汶汶焉,汩汩焉,寡廉鲜耻焉,虽近于比肩,戎狄也”。
显然瞿太素在这里表达的华夷之辨有一个前提就是:这些话是说给华夏人自己听的,而不是说给全世界听的,意思是我们虽然是华夏人,但是一旦丧失孝悌忠信这些宝贵的品质,那么我们也将可能沦为蛮夷。如果是身在外邦的华夏人,虽然离着祖国十万八千里,有的生活在加拿大,有的生活在美国,有的生活在澳洲,有的生活在马来西亚,只要他们保持了孝悌忠信的传统,他们还是诸夏。
华夷之辨是华夏人的文明与野蛮文明之辨!中国传统观念里的“华夷之辨”,从来排斥的不是其他文明中优秀的先进的东西,恰恰相反,排斥抵制的是野蛮的落后的东西,对文明,哪怕是来自再遥远的地方的其他文明,中国都是抱着开放的态度来接纳和吸收的.
如果觉得瞿太素说的还是不够详细,不够透彻。那么就让我们来看明朝末期的五大思想家(方以智、朱舜水、黄宗羲、王夫之、顾炎武)之一的王夫之说的一段话。在王夫之的这段话里,他提出了在他那个时代,相当大胆惊人的假说,放在当时全世界范围来看,这也是最为先进的而且相当具有独创性和前瞻性的思想。

https://preview.redd.it/e5hq3didsrd81.jpg?width=650&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=727574ef905c92b2636fb98b85cdc501355c1630
王夫之说:
“在近小间有如此者,推之荒远,此混沌而彼文明,又何怪乎?《易》曰:‘乾坤毁则无以见易’,非谓天地之裂也,乾坤之大文不行于此土,则其德毁矣”
王夫之提出了这样的观点,他说“中国之文,乍明乍灭,他日者必且陵蔑以之于无文,而人之返乎轩辕以前,蔑不夷矣。”也就是说中国的文明一会儿明亮,一会儿熄灭,将来必定消失退化到没有文明的状态,人也退化返回到轩辕以前,没有一个不是夷狄(“蔑不夷矣”)。显然这里的“夷”正是和文明对立的野蛮的同意词。也指明朝覆亡,我们被满清所统治,由华入夷!
王夫之这里,为什么要这么说?他正是看到了当时中国被野蛮的满清所统治,因此作出了这样一个大胆的预言,应该说他的预言完全得到了证实。明朝时期中国被西方传教士看成是世界上最文明的国度,人民也是文明程度最高的,经过满清两百多年的统治之后,到满清末期,几乎所有的西方人眼中的中国都成为了一个野蛮的国家,人民都是野蛮的半开化的人。历史的发展完全证实了王夫之悲痛的预言。

https://preview.redd.it/nfngmn3gsrd81.jpg?width=650&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=223dd21022cc6270422792bc334501ddf74275cf
为了更清楚的理解王夫之的观点,我们不妨再看看他的文明进化论的观点。王夫之说“故吾所知者,中国之天下,轩辕以前,其犹夷狄乎!太昊以上,其犹禽兽乎!禽兽不能备其质,夷狄不能备其文……所谓饥则呴呴,饱则弃余者,亦直立之兽而已”
也就是说,中国这块地方,在轩辕以前,也就是夷狄,太昊以上,就是禽兽(在这里王夫之,已经提出了动物禽兽进化成人的概念,当然明朝正德年间的思想巨人王廷相就已经提出了物竞天择,弱肉强食的概念,可以说是进化论思想的先驱)。王夫之这里的所说的夷狄是一个判别文明程度的概念,夷狄就代表着野蛮。
华夷之辨的实质就是告诉华夏人一个实的世界,那就是文明与野蛮之辨。虽然我们的血统是华夏人,但由于被夷狄统治,时刻都有可能从华夏之人变成夷狄之人。中国传统观念里华夷之辨的要害就在于保卫文明,抵抗野蛮的侵略,防止一切野蛮对文明的侵略导致的社会倒退文明破坏的悲剧的发生。

https://preview.redd.it/gv16bhrisrd81.jpg?width=500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e03e238ea49db2fc89370c2da8fcaed20ec3b803
正是从文明进化,防止野蛮民族对文明的破坏,使社会发生严重倒退停滞的宏观大视角出发,王夫之斩钉截铁掷地有声的提出一个论断“可禅,可继,可革!而不可使夷类间之”。这话,百年之下,读来,犹如雷震耳,虎虎有生气。翻译成现代汉语就是说:一个文明国家的政权,可以让出来,可以继承下去,也可以革命造反加以变动,但决不能让野蛮加以统治掺杂。
意思是我们中国人自己的事情,我们自己不管是庶民革命,还是贵族禅让,政权的更替只能在华夏人内部进行。而不能由夷狄来主导中国的政权,满清就是当时的夷狄,所以他们主导的政权,就是殖民政权。那样就会导致文明停滞倒退甚至毁灭的灾难性的后果,也就是王夫之所说的“中国之文,乍明乍灭,他日者必且陵蔑以之于无文,而人之返乎轩辕以前,蔑不夷矣。”
根据王夫之评传一书的作者所说,事实上“在王夫之看来,纯粹的‘夷狄’文化尚有其长处,而如果华夏的文化退化为‘夷’,为‘野’,那所产生出来的乃是一种更加不祥的新劣种”,中国在明朝灭亡之后,悲剧性的历史发展进程,也证实了王夫之的这种观点,不能不说王夫之的思想实在是具有相当的洞察力。
但王夫之也并没有因此陷入绝对的悲观绝望,一方面“他深信‘日照月临之下’,必有文明的存在”,“此混沌而彼文明又何怪乎!”也就是说王夫之深信,就算中国的文明毁灭了消亡了熄灭了,用他的话说“陵蔑以之于无文,而人之返乎轩辕以前,蔑不夷矣”,但在这日照月临之下的世界上,肯定还会有别的文明的存在,“此混沌而彼文明又何怪乎!”,只要文明的火种还能在‘日照月临之下’的世界上传承下去,那也就没有什么好怨怪的。
另一方面,王夫之也深信,中国的文明虽然目前处于满请的残暴压制之下,趋于毁灭,但将来一定还会有崛起的那一天,他充满激情的预言“尽中区之智力,治轩辕之天下,族类强植,仁勇竞命,虽历百世而弱丧之祸消也。”也就是只要能族类强植,仁勇竞命,就算经历一百个世代,中国的文明也终有消除弱丧之祸,重新崛起的时候!

https://preview.redd.it/nrtz93ilsrd81.jpg?width=327&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6bfb6496b4f4918b08d49ca800efed28bec95e05
正是从文明进化,防止野蛮民族对文明的破坏,使社会发生严重倒退停滞的宏观大视角出发,王夫之斩钉截铁掷地有声的提出一个论断“可禅,可继,可革!而不可使夷类间之”。这话,百年之下,读来,犹如雷震耳,虎虎有生气。翻译成现代汉语就是说:一个文明国家的政权,可以让出来,可以继承下去,也可以革命造反加以变动,但决不能让野蛮加以统治掺杂。
意思是我们中国人自己的事情,我们自己不管是庶民革命,还是贵族禅让,政权的更替只能在华夏人内部进行。而不能由夷狄来主导中国的政权,满清就是当时的夷狄,所以他们主导的政权,就是殖民政权。那样就会导致文明停滞倒退甚至毁灭的灾难性的后果,也就是王夫之所说的“中国之文,乍明乍灭,他日者必且陵蔑以之于无文,而人之返乎轩辕以前,蔑不夷矣。”
根据王夫之评传一书的作者所说,事实上“在王夫之看来,纯粹的‘夷狄’文化尚有其长处,而如果华夏的文化退化为‘夷’,为‘野’,那所产生出来的乃是一种更加不祥的新劣种”,中国在明朝灭亡之后,悲剧性的历史发展进程,也证实了王夫之的这种观点,不能不说王夫之的思想实在是具有相当的洞察力。
但王夫之也并没有因此陷入绝对的悲观绝望,一方面“他深信‘日照月临之下’,必有文明的存在”,“此混沌而彼文明又何怪乎!”也就是说王夫之深信,就算中国的文明毁灭了消亡了熄灭了,用他的话说“陵蔑以之于无文,而人之返乎轩辕以前,蔑不夷矣”,但在这日照月临之下的世界上,肯定还会有别的文明的存在,“此混沌而彼文明又何怪乎!”,只要文明的火种还能在‘日照月临之下’的世界上传承下去,那也就没有什么好怨怪的。
另一方面,王夫之也深信,中国的文明虽然目前处于满请的残暴压制之下,趋于毁灭,但将来一定还会有崛起的那一天,他充满激情的预言“尽中区之智力,治轩辕之天下,族类强植,仁勇竞命,虽历百世而弱丧之祸消也。”也就是只要能族类强植,仁勇竞命,就算经历一百个世代,中国的文明也终有消除弱丧之祸,重新崛起的时候!

https://preview.redd.it/65f0fgkosrd81.jpg?width=640&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c4640eccb07df915d2f9b87fcf7e422209647dea
若野蛮征服文明、夷狄僭越中国,无论其表面如何,其实质终为为外敌入寇侵略中国。历史证明了:非我族类其心必异,夷狄之政人面兽心。所以,从来不曾有过真正意义上的“华夷易位”,华夏永远是华夏,只有孝子逆子之分,而夷狄永远是夷狄。

https://preview.redd.it/d2457puqsrd81.jpg?width=600&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b5f3ed452a5f4ff452419351c998b2910e5655e0
另外,“尊王攘夷”一词最早见于《春秋公羊传》,该书是解释儒家经典《春秋》的三部专著之一。本意为“尊勤君王,攘斥外夷”
如孔子称赞管仲尊王攘夷的功绩:“微管仲,吾其被发左衽矣。”
西晋江统《徙戎论》“春秋之义,内诸夏而外夷狄”
朱熹称赞管仲:“尊周室,攘夷狄,皆所以正天下也。”
顾炎武称赞管仲:“春秋之义,尊天王,攘夷狄,诛乱臣贼子,皆性也,皆天道也。”
梁朝 丘迟《与陈伯之书》:“霜露所均,不育异类;姬汉旧邦,无取杂种。”
管仲:“戎狄豺狼,不可厌也,诸夏亲昵,不可弃也。”
魏征:“夷狄非我族类,其心必异,强必寇盗,弱而卑伏,不顾恩义,其天性也。
唐太宗李世民:“戎狄人面兽心,微不得意,必反噬为害。”
唐太宗李世民:“中国百姓,实天下之根本,四夷之人,乃同枝叶,扰其根本以厚枝叶,而求久安,未之有也。”
很多人以为满清的夜郎自大和愚妄顽固是源于汉族传统的华夷之辨思想。其实呢,满清入关后,绞杀汉那族传统的华夷之辨思想,是下了狠功夫的。搞剃发易服,文字狱,以及上述的《大意觉迷录》的炮制对士大夫阶层个下层民众进行洗脑。这就是对付华夷之辨的手段。
康熙酋长说:“朕临御多年,每以汉人为难治,以其不能一心之故,国家承平日久,务须安不忘危”。
道光酋长《重篹福建通志》:“设禁之意,特恐吾民作奸勾夷,以窥中土”
这些无疑都是满洲贵族对于民族隔离和防范的集中体现。
说到这里,我们就可以完全明白满清统治以前中国“华夷之辨”的观念实质就是文明与野蛮之辨!只有到了满清统治下,这个概念因雍正酋长写的一本《大义觉迷录》扭曲了华夷之辨的本质,消磨了中国汉民族的斗志与民族精神。灌输了即便是异族也可以随意征服统治我们。从华夷之辨的本质来看:只有我们自己才是这片土地的主人,任何异族永远没有资格来侵占我们的国家,杀戮我们的人民,主宰我们的命运!请永远记住这一点!

https://preview.redd.it/ot82gc7tsrd81.jpg?width=500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f14a878682f1df66b11324add4ec388b3b9153c8
华夷之辨首先是一种民族身份认同,然后才是文明野蛮之辨,而文明的标准就是“礼乐”。同时“华夷之辨”还是一套世界秩序管理体系即中华世界体系的核心观念。华夷之辨,内中国外夷狄,贵中国贱夷狄。体系的中心是炎黄血统的华夏民族,体系的基础是强大的物质与军事力量,对周边族群用华夏礼义来实现“用夏变夷”,使四夷臣服,事中国以忠。
(注:转自:有明人,以上图文版权及活动解释权归原作者及原出处所有,如涉及版权问题,请及时联系我们。汉服微资讯 | 带您了解更多汉服资讯)
submitted by knitslip to hanbenwei [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 OmerSuner 😅😂🤣

😅😂🤣 submitted by OmerSuner to pinkfloyd [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 orionbloom 220125 Sieun to Host the Gaon Chart Music Awards Alongside Jaejae & Doyoung of NCT on January 27th

220125 Sieun to Host the Gaon Chart Music Awards Alongside Jaejae & Doyoung of NCT on January 27th submitted by orionbloom to STAYC [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 Relaapse Free ticket to Skegss tonight at 5:45

Hey guys,
My partner can't come anymore - so u have an extra ticket to the concert tonight. Doors open at 5 for a 5.45 start.
Event is seated - so you would have to sit next to me. Pretty introverted by nature, so no pressure to talk to me unless u want to.
Not selling it.- just giving it away - can buy me a drink if you want.
Pm me or reply here if you want it.
submitted by Relaapse to sydney [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 Low-Engineering-9653 Lego sale

Having a lego sale of brand bee never open legos. Text me at 3035491807 and say legos. Have lego Starwars and more.
submitted by Low-Engineering-9653 to CalPoly [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 MakeRooom Which Ufo prop Do I need for big vape?

submitted by MakeRooom to PokerStars_VR [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 Pleasant_Plan_5341 Am I the only 175+ without a T14 acceptance

applied mid October. I am a splitter so wasn’t expecting THAT many T14s to want me but with a 175, I thought I’d at least have a shot. As of now, I’ve only been waitlisted/rejected and still waiting on a few more. Not loving my chances….
submitted by Pleasant_Plan_5341 to lawschooladmissions [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 eehui missing out cqb and re taking it?

I will be missing out in cqb cuz of mc. Wondering if there will be re test?
submitted by eehui to NationalServiceSG [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 FADIKALIL الأخبار:سعد الحريري ..الهاوية لا حافتها..هل يتدخل السعوديون والأميركيون لتجميد القرار؟

submitted by FADIKALIL to Beiruttime [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 jenjen7543 💵$25 Sign-up Bonus▪️No deposit◾ Download app▪️Select "manage my cash and build my savings" get $15.▪️Then add track my credit for 🆓 and get $10 more. ▪️All cash rewards available to redeem immediately. ▪️My link for the $15 and $10 bonus have no Requirements but to sign up !▪️USA ONLY▪️

💵$25 Sign-up Bonus▪️No deposit◾ Download app▪️Select submitted by jenjen7543 to ReferralCodesForYou [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 isssuekid Idiot falls for classic prank

submitted by isssuekid to facepalm [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 patientlywaiting82 Online counselling

Hi everyone!
I’ve had severe anxiety and housebound agoraphobia for about 4 years now. In this time, I’ve made several attempts to see different kinds of specialists, but nothing’s worked out. (Mainly because I’ve struggled to attend the appointments).
I’m now considering online counselling, and was wondering if anyone here would be comfortable enough to share their experience with it.
More specifically, what it entailed, how frequent the sessions were, how much it cost, and whether or not you found it helpful.
Any responses would be appreciated!
Thank you.
submitted by patientlywaiting82 to Agoraphobia [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 kalpesh2872 Quarashi.Network Big Project

This project has a very bright future,because I really think this project is too perfect to be true.This is a very cool and innovative project.This project has a very bright future. creating diversified investment portfolios and generating substantial financial returns for users.
cryptonews #cryptowallet #bscgems #ethereumblockchain #QuarashiNetwork #Blockchain #ICO #Presale https://quarashi.network/
submitted by kalpesh2872 to ico [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 painting_solace Insight on why people my age haven’t been interested in me romantically

Hi everyone, I’m a 24 year old Bi woman, mid size and medium pretty. I have been told my eyes and my lips are to die for by other women and complemented by men on my terrific smile.
In my early 20s I was struggling with my mental health so I put off dating because I wasn’t myself and it wouldn’t be fair to another person to put that responsibility on them. So once I felt better around when I was 22 I started to put myself out there more (for me at least) engage with my peers, go to house parties, even asked a few people out. All of them went out for casual drinks and that was it or just let me down saying they didn’t feel the same way. (Which is totally valid romantic/sexual attraction can’t and shouldn’t be forced) I have been told by friends and peers that I’m funny, smart, kind, and talented.
In more recent times my therapist (yes therapist - it’s nice to talk things out) asked me why I think I have had no luck romantically attracting my peers when I seem to be an awesome person. (their words not mine - I hope I’m seen as awesome) I think I come off as intense, and maybe a bit boring because I can be a bit of an introvert, I don’t think I come off well on internet dates - I know I’m a better friend and then I chill out a bit so maybe that’s more attractive to just know me first.
Anyways I was just wondering if there was anyone out there to prove to someone who is feeling a little down and cynical about dating - are there guys out there who would want to - really want to - go out on a date with an interesting, smart, nerdy, funny girl. Who likes improv, dnd, art, cozy blankets, human rights, dogs, kids and making the world a kinder place. A girl who struggles with mental health but has a good support system.
I’m just feeling like I need some proof that there are guys who are attracted to intense and bold women. Because so far I haven’t seen proof for myself and I don’t want to give up on myself or others.
submitted by painting_solace to AskMenAdvice [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 Hoppus87 TIL “Millions Of Cats” by Wanda Gág Is the oldest american picture book still in print.

TIL “Millions Of Cats” by Wanda Gág Is the oldest american picture book still in print. submitted by Hoppus87 to todayilearned [link] [comments]


2022.01.25 02:32 SmallWeenyHole What's my Alien ware 51m R2 realistically Worth 6 month after Purchase?

Alienware - Area 51M R2 17.3" FHD Gaming Laptop - Intel Core i7 - 16GB Memory - NVIDIA RTX 2070 Super - 512GB Solid State Drive - Lunar Light - Best Tobi Version
Model:AWARR2-7316WHT-PUS SKU:6427166
2200$ USD all said and done so I am curious what you guys think I can recoup
I like in a studio with my A/C on all day so temps aren't ever an issue. I don't overclock.
I am not sure the market value of this laptop, there sales have been banned in a few states including mine (California)
I currently added a 2TB SATA drive and upgraded to 32GB of ram but would only keep them in the system if it was worth it value wise. Thanks for advice guys.
submitted by SmallWeenyHole to pcmasterrace [link] [comments]


http://otellesnoe.ru