Otra tarea cumplida de una ilustración de la WT donde descubrimos s algo...

2022.01.25 02:32 Psychological_Eye167 Otra tarea cumplida de una ilustración de la WT donde descubrimos s algo...

Otra tarea cumplida de una ilustración de la WT donde descubrimos s algo... submitted by Psychological_Eye167 to Extj [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 FADIKALIL أمیر عبداللهیان : إذا کان التوصل إلى اتفاق جید یتطلب حوارا مع امریکا فلن نتجاهله- الأخبار ایران

submitted by FADIKALIL to Beiruttime [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 superfahd A bunch of questions from an absolute beginner. Any help appreciated

Hi all. I'm trying to approach this game without looking up any videos for help but there are some things I can't seem to figure out. I've just started the campaign and only gotten to the first fleet HQ location for saving

  1. Is there a way to scout out cities to see what sort of opposition you'll be facing before committing to a fight? In my last battle I sent out a quick fast detachment of 2 ships and nearly got wiped out because I sent them in blind. I won at the end but it was pretty hairy
  2. At the beginning of the campaign, you're advised to take at least 1 tanker but there are no tanker in the roster. I see that the Sevastopol has tanker capabilities. Is that enough at the beginning?
  3. If individual ships have their own ranges, how exactly do tankers help? Does having a tanker increase your overall range? Do ships refuel inflight automatically?
  4. At the beginning I was told to search for allies "in the north-west". That's pretty vague. There are a lot of places that are roughly NW. How far am I supposed to search?
  5. I read somewhere in this subreddit that proximity munitions are completely broken because of how much damage they do. Should I avoid using them for now? I don't want to cheese the campaign
  6. Is there any way to force a save before getting to a fleet HQ? I usually dont a lot of time to game and would hate to lose my progress
submitted by superfahd to Highfleet [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 ShakaUVM The Free World Defense to the Problem of Evil

We are all aware that Free Will is considered a generally robust defense against the Problem of Evil when it comes to moral evil; in this post I will show that the Free World defense is sufficient to cover what is called "natural evil" as well.
Let me start with some obvious points that a lot of people seem to miss when it comes to the Problem of evil.
P1) Tyranny is a moral evil, and
P2) Freedom is a moral good.
Justification: Freedom is, in fact, the most basic of all moral goods, as if you remove someone's freedom, you have removed their ability to make moral decisions. Consider, for example, a robber who holds up a bank. Normally, tellers will not rob from a bank and give you money, but when the robber tyrannically imposes on them with a gun, they remove the freedom of the teller, and compel them to do evil (theft) on the robber's behalf.
Tyranny (enforcing one's will over another's will) removes freedom. Therefore, it is inherently evil.
God desires people to make moral decisions, and thus does not desire to be a tyrant. We know this since the most basic purpose of the Bible is moral instruction - moral instruction is incompatible with tyranny, as tyranny overrides moral agency, and moral instruction cultivates moral agency.
Or to put it an even simpler way, since tyranny is fundamentally evil, it is incompatible with omnibenevolence.
Therefore, all versions of the Problem of Evil that require God to be an omnibenevolent tyrant are self-contradictory, and thus logically invalid.
Now let's see how many PoEs we can take out in one fell swoop...
Which versions of the Problem of Evil demand a tyrant? Well, close to all of them. Remember, tyranny is defined as doing something just because you desire it, enforcing your will over other's will. So many versions of the Problem of Evil do what I call the Tyrant Twist, where they leap immediately from God desiring something to thinking that God must do them - i.e., presuming that God must be a tyrant. But they rarely spell it out explicitly, because to do so would give up the game, and make it obvious that the argument doesn't actually work.
Here's the first formulation from the SEP: 1. If God exists, then God is omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfect. 2. If God is omnipotent, then God has the power to eliminate all evil. 3. If God is omniscient, then God knows when evil exists. 4. If God is morally perfect, then God has the desire to eliminate all evil. 5. Evil exists. 6. If evil exists and God exists, then either God doesn’t have the power to eliminate all evil, or doesn’t know when evil exists, or doesn’t have the desire to eliminate all evil. 7. Therefore, God doesn’t exist.
The problem, is, of course, with 6. God has the power to eliminate all evil. God does know when evil exists. And God does desire to eliminate evil. So it's just clearly a blunder on the author's part. There's no logical connection between the antecedent and consequent, logically speaking, and no justification is provided. The author relies on the Tyrant Twist to provide some invisible handwaving. Of course God must enforce his desires, why wouldn't He?
Nonsense. Because God is not a tyrant.
Even a great philosopher like Rowe relies on the Tyrant Twist, but at least he does so explicitly: "P2. An omniscient, wholly good being would prevent the occurrence of any intense suffering it could, unless it could not do so without thereby losing some greater good or permitting some evil equally bad or worse."
Again, it relies on equating God's desires to always turning them into actions. I.e., acting as a tyrant, like Cartman in South Park.
For fun, here's Ricky Gervais' fallacious take on the PoE: https://inktank.fi/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/RickyGervaisatheistquote6.jpg
This is just a false alternatives fallacy. After all, having the ability to stop evil and the desire to stop evil, but choosing not to is not one of the options. Once again we see "Wanting to stop evil" presuming, invisibly, that God must take action on those desires.
Here's another from the SEP:

There are events in our world — such as an animal’s dying an agonizing death in a forest fire, and a child’s undergo lingering suffering and eventual death due to cancer — such that the actions of allowing those events, when one could prevent them, both (a) have very serious, known wrongmaking characteristics, and (b) have no rightmaking characteristics of which we are aware that are sufficient to balance out the known wrongmaking properties.
This is just an appeal to ignorance fallacy, so is invalid anyway (it is not allowed to conclude something from ignorance), but we see it ignoring the very real fact that freedom is a moral good.
(Freedom, honestly, seems to be completely neglected in these arguments, even by the SEP author.)
Here's Wikipedia's logical PoE formulation #1: 1. If an omnipotent, omnibenevolent and omniscient god exists, then evil does not. 2. There is evil in the world. 3. Therefore, an omnipotent, omnibenevolent and omniscient god does not exist.
Once again, we see in #1 the invisible assumption that desire must necessarily translate into action. The presumption that an all-good entity, which does not desire evil, must somehow stamp out all evil in the universe, thus becoming a tyrant. Thus this argument is invalid.
The second formulation on Wikipedia actually makes the Tyrant Twist clear: 1. God exists. 2. God is omnipotent, omnibenevolent and omniscient. 3. An omnipotent being has the power to prevent that evil from coming into existence. 4. An omnibenevolent being would want to prevent all evils. 5. An omniscient being knows every way in which evils can come into existence, and knows every way in which those evils could be prevented. 6. A being who knows every way in which an evil can come into existence, who is able to prevent that evil from coming into existence, and who wants to do so, would prevent the existence of that evil. 7. If there exists an omnipotent, omnibenevolent and omniscient God, then no evil exists. 8. Evil exists (logical contradiction).
  1. is of course the Tyrant Twist. That everything God desires He must necessarily turn into action. Thus enforcing His will over the wills of others. Thus removing moral agency, and any ability for morality in the universe to take place. Thus being evil. Thus making this argument also a contradiction, and thus invalid, and thus must be discarded like all of the others.
I could go on, but basically I'll just stop here and say how odd I find it that philosophers, who should know better, give such weight to tyranny and treat freedom so lightly, when our moral priorities should be the other way around. Freedom is a very serious moral matter. As I said before, it is the very foundation of morality, as morality cannot take place without freedom.
So let me say why God is not evil, and why God and evil in the world can and should co-exist. God desires man to have freedom, and not just freedom in the sense of free will, but freedom in the sense of a free world. This is proper moral behavior for an all-good entity, not the sky-tyrant that atheists presume when they ask - no, demand - that God intervene to stop all evils (or stop all gratuitous evils). They don't see the contradiction. I do. God grants us freedom in this world so that we can be moral agents. Moreover, so that we can grow in morality, and rise above a moral childhood and become moral adults. What distinguishes childhood and adulthood (other than age) is responsibility. We are responsible for this world.
In the very first chapter of the Bible, we see God granting dominion over the earth to mankind (Genesis 1:26). This means it is our earth to use or abuse. It is our responsibility. In the same way that we don't install spy cameras in every room in America (1984-style) knowing that some crime will result from this freedom, God has turned responsibility of the earth over to us. When there's a tsunami or pandemic, or a hundred other horrible events that we mistakenly call "natural evil" in philosophy, the obvious, emotional response is to ask God why. But that's a mistake. A moral blunder, though a very human one.
It's not God's responsibility to make a vaccine against Covid-19 or build breakwaters to stop a tsunami. It is ours. We are moral agents with dominion over the earth. It is our responsibility. It is a Free World, not a world under a tyrant. And this is morally good.
submitted by ShakaUVM to DebateReligion [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 R3ndr0c Has anyone recently climbed out of archon?

If so, how long did it take you, and what was your strategy?
submitted by R3ndr0c to DotA2 [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 FrontpageWatch2020 [#578|+2016|32] Put ur hands up if ur guilty of this😂 [r/memes]

submitted by FrontpageWatch2020 to longtail [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 delamerica93 Literally what the fuck do we do against Squirtle?

Squirtle can do literally anything he wants to link. Want to pull a bomb? Squirtle can run all the way across the stage before your animation is even over and do whatever they want. Almost none of our moves even hit because his hitbox is so short. Back air doesn't land, up tilt doesn't land, boomerangs are almost impossible to get off if the Squirtle is even halfway decent, and when they need to kill they get you offstage once, switch to Ivysaur, and spam their spike onstage with zero repercussions, lag, timing, nothing just spam and it works 90% of the time.
If you're a Pokemon trainer and you don't go Squirtle every single time you're an idiot, it's like playing on the easiest possible settings
submitted by delamerica93 to LinkMains [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 petyr2 Question about the blue trash bags

Can regular trash bags go inside them? (Like a small bathroom trash bag filled with trash)
Or does all the trash have to be visible through the bag?
submitted by petyr2 to Binghamton [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 ThatAbandonGuy Can I switch servers while keeping data?

Curious as to how (if able to) to switch servers.
submitted by ThatAbandonGuy to MerchantMaster [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 knitslip “华夷之辨”的真相

“华夷之辨”的真相 华夷之辨是华夏民族构建的文明体系,是华夏民族主流核心价值观。瞿太素说:






梁朝 丘迟《与陈伯之书》:“霜露所均,不育异类;姬汉旧邦,无取杂种。”

(注:转自:有明人,以上图文版权及活动解释权归原作者及原出处所有,如涉及版权问题,请及时联系我们。汉服微资讯 | 带您了解更多汉服资讯)
submitted by knitslip to hanbenwei [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 OmerSuner 😅😂🤣

😅😂🤣 submitted by OmerSuner to pinkfloyd [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 orionbloom 220125 Sieun to Host the Gaon Chart Music Awards Alongside Jaejae & Doyoung of NCT on January 27th

220125 Sieun to Host the Gaon Chart Music Awards Alongside Jaejae & Doyoung of NCT on January 27th submitted by orionbloom to STAYC [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 Relaapse Free ticket to Skegss tonight at 5:45

Hey guys,
My partner can't come anymore - so u have an extra ticket to the concert tonight. Doors open at 5 for a 5.45 start.
Event is seated - so you would have to sit next to me. Pretty introverted by nature, so no pressure to talk to me unless u want to.
Not selling it.- just giving it away - can buy me a drink if you want.
Pm me or reply here if you want it.
submitted by Relaapse to sydney [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 Low-Engineering-9653 Lego sale

Having a lego sale of brand bee never open legos. Text me at 3035491807 and say legos. Have lego Starwars and more.
submitted by Low-Engineering-9653 to CalPoly [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 MakeRooom Which Ufo prop Do I need for big vape?

submitted by MakeRooom to PokerStars_VR [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 Pleasant_Plan_5341 Am I the only 175+ without a T14 acceptance

applied mid October. I am a splitter so wasn’t expecting THAT many T14s to want me but with a 175, I thought I’d at least have a shot. As of now, I’ve only been waitlisted/rejected and still waiting on a few more. Not loving my chances….
submitted by Pleasant_Plan_5341 to lawschooladmissions [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 eehui missing out cqb and re taking it?

I will be missing out in cqb cuz of mc. Wondering if there will be re test?
submitted by eehui to NationalServiceSG [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 FADIKALIL الأخبار:سعد الحريري ..الهاوية لا حافتها..هل يتدخل السعوديون والأميركيون لتجميد القرار؟

submitted by FADIKALIL to Beiruttime [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 jenjen7543 💵$25 Sign-up Bonus▪️No deposit◾ Download app▪️Select "manage my cash and build my savings" get $15.▪️Then add track my credit for 🆓 and get $10 more. ▪️All cash rewards available to redeem immediately. ▪️My link for the $15 and $10 bonus have no Requirements but to sign up !▪️USA ONLY▪️

💵$25 Sign-up Bonus▪️No deposit◾ Download app▪️Select submitted by jenjen7543 to ReferralCodesForYou [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 isssuekid Idiot falls for classic prank

submitted by isssuekid to facepalm [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 patientlywaiting82 Online counselling

Hi everyone!
I’ve had severe anxiety and housebound agoraphobia for about 4 years now. In this time, I’ve made several attempts to see different kinds of specialists, but nothing’s worked out. (Mainly because I’ve struggled to attend the appointments).
I’m now considering online counselling, and was wondering if anyone here would be comfortable enough to share their experience with it.
More specifically, what it entailed, how frequent the sessions were, how much it cost, and whether or not you found it helpful.
Any responses would be appreciated!
Thank you.
submitted by patientlywaiting82 to Agoraphobia [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 kalpesh2872 Quarashi.Network Big Project

This project has a very bright future,because I really think this project is too perfect to be true.This is a very cool and innovative project.This project has a very bright future. creating diversified investment portfolios and generating substantial financial returns for users.
cryptonews #cryptowallet #bscgems #ethereumblockchain #QuarashiNetwork #Blockchain #ICO #Presale https://quarashi.network/
submitted by kalpesh2872 to ico [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 painting_solace Insight on why people my age haven’t been interested in me romantically

Hi everyone, I’m a 24 year old Bi woman, mid size and medium pretty. I have been told my eyes and my lips are to die for by other women and complemented by men on my terrific smile.
In my early 20s I was struggling with my mental health so I put off dating because I wasn’t myself and it wouldn’t be fair to another person to put that responsibility on them. So once I felt better around when I was 22 I started to put myself out there more (for me at least) engage with my peers, go to house parties, even asked a few people out. All of them went out for casual drinks and that was it or just let me down saying they didn’t feel the same way. (Which is totally valid romantic/sexual attraction can’t and shouldn’t be forced) I have been told by friends and peers that I’m funny, smart, kind, and talented.
In more recent times my therapist (yes therapist - it’s nice to talk things out) asked me why I think I have had no luck romantically attracting my peers when I seem to be an awesome person. (their words not mine - I hope I’m seen as awesome) I think I come off as intense, and maybe a bit boring because I can be a bit of an introvert, I don’t think I come off well on internet dates - I know I’m a better friend and then I chill out a bit so maybe that’s more attractive to just know me first.
Anyways I was just wondering if there was anyone out there to prove to someone who is feeling a little down and cynical about dating - are there guys out there who would want to - really want to - go out on a date with an interesting, smart, nerdy, funny girl. Who likes improv, dnd, art, cozy blankets, human rights, dogs, kids and making the world a kinder place. A girl who struggles with mental health but has a good support system.
I’m just feeling like I need some proof that there are guys who are attracted to intense and bold women. Because so far I haven’t seen proof for myself and I don’t want to give up on myself or others.
submitted by painting_solace to AskMenAdvice [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 Hoppus87 TIL “Millions Of Cats” by Wanda Gág Is the oldest american picture book still in print.

TIL “Millions Of Cats” by Wanda Gág Is the oldest american picture book still in print. submitted by Hoppus87 to todayilearned [link] [comments]

2022.01.25 02:32 SmallWeenyHole What's my Alien ware 51m R2 realistically Worth 6 month after Purchase?

Alienware - Area 51M R2 17.3" FHD Gaming Laptop - Intel Core i7 - 16GB Memory - NVIDIA RTX 2070 Super - 512GB Solid State Drive - Lunar Light - Best Tobi Version
Model:AWARR2-7316WHT-PUS SKU:6427166
2200$ USD all said and done so I am curious what you guys think I can recoup
I like in a studio with my A/C on all day so temps aren't ever an issue. I don't overclock.
I am not sure the market value of this laptop, there sales have been banned in a few states including mine (California)
I currently added a 2TB SATA drive and upgraded to 32GB of ram but would only keep them in the system if it was worth it value wise. Thanks for advice guys.
submitted by SmallWeenyHole to pcmasterrace [link] [comments]